Keywords
procedural justice
sentence
perception
responsiveness
treatment
juvenile delinquents
sentence
perception
responsiveness
treatment
juvenile delinquents
How to Cite
López Escobar, A. E. ., & Frías Armenta, M. . (2014). Procedural justice and responsiveness to psychological treatment of juvenile delinquents . Psicumex, 4(1), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.36793/psicumex.v4i1.241
Abstract
The aim of this research is to prove a structural model to analyze the relationship between procedural justice and the responsiveness to psychological treatment in juvenile delinquents. The sample were 92 adolescents who were sentenced by a juvenile court. Participants answered a questionnaire related to perception of the judicial procedure, treatment of the police, acceptation of the sentence and psychological treatment that received. Results revealed that of the adolescent positive perception of judge predicted the responsiveness of psychological treatment.
References
Bentler, P. M. (2006). EQS 6 Structural Equations Program Manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software Inc.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. En K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Constitución Política Mexicana. (2013). Recuperado de http://www.diputados.gob. mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/1.pdf.
Diario Oficial de la Federación. (2005). Recuperado de http://www.diputados. gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/ref/dof/CPEUM_ ref_165_12dic05_ima.pdf.
Fagan, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2005). Legal Socialization of Children and Adolescents. Social Justice Research, 18(3), 217-241.
González de la Vega, R. (2005). Justicia e ideología. México DF: Universidad Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI). (2010). México: Anuario estadístico del Estado de Sonora.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI). (2011). México: Anuario de Estadísticas por Entidad Federativa.
Jiménez O. R. (2011). Violencia Social y Vulnerabilidad Juvenil. Instituto Ciudadano de Estudios Sobre la Inseguridad, A. C. Recuperado de http://www.icesi.org.mx/ publicaciones/articulos/2002/violencia_ social_y_vulnerabilidad_juvenil.asp.
Jost, J. T., & Major, B. (2001). The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice and Intergroup Relations. (2a ed.). Londres: Cambridge University Press.
Lind, E. A. (1997). Litigation and claiming in organizations: Antisocial behavior or quest for justice? En R. A. Giacalone & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in organizations (pp. 150-171). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Little, T., Cunningham, W., Shahar, G., &
Widaman, K. (2002). To parcel or not parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 151-173.
Maiese, M. (2004). Procedural Justice. Beyond Intractability. En G. Burgess & H. Burgess (Eds.), Conflict Information Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder. Recuperado de: <http://www.beyondintractability.org/bi- essay/procedural-justice>.
Perelman, C. (1964). De la Justicia. México DF: Universidad Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas.
Pound, R. (1951). The need of a sociological jurisprudence. Justice According to Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Manual del usuario del sistema básico de IBM SPSS Statistics 20. (2011). Copyright IBM Corporation 1989, 2011. Recuperado de ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/analytics/ spss/documentation/statistics/20.0/es/client/ Manuals/IBM_SPSS_Statistics_Core_ System_Users_Guide.pdf.
Stammler, R. (1958). La esencia del derecho y la ciencia del derecho. Madrid: Espasa–Calpe.
Tyler, T. R. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. En M. H. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 30, pp. 431-505). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Perception of adolescents about the judicial procedure and treatment in detention and their effect on social rehabilitation. Princenton: Princeton University Press.
Tyler, T. R., & Bies, R. J. (1990). Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In J. Carroll (Ed.), Applied social psychology and organizational settings, (pp.77-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Tyler, T. R., & Mentovich, A. (2011). Mechanisms of Legal Effect: Theories of Procedural Justice. A methods monograph. New York: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Ullman, J. B. (2006). Structural equation modeling: Reviewing the basics and moving forward. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 35–50.
Weisz, V., Wingrove, T., & Faith-Slaker, A. (2007). Children and Procedural Justice. Court Review. The Journal of the American Judges Association, 44, 216. Recuperado de http:// digitalcommons.unl.edu/ajacourtreview/216.
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. En K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Constitución Política Mexicana. (2013). Recuperado de http://www.diputados.gob. mx/LeyesBiblio/pdf/1.pdf.
Diario Oficial de la Federación. (2005). Recuperado de http://www.diputados. gob.mx/LeyesBiblio/ref/dof/CPEUM_ ref_165_12dic05_ima.pdf.
Fagan, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2005). Legal Socialization of Children and Adolescents. Social Justice Research, 18(3), 217-241.
González de la Vega, R. (2005). Justicia e ideología. México DF: Universidad Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI). (2010). México: Anuario estadístico del Estado de Sonora.
Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI). (2011). México: Anuario de Estadísticas por Entidad Federativa.
Jiménez O. R. (2011). Violencia Social y Vulnerabilidad Juvenil. Instituto Ciudadano de Estudios Sobre la Inseguridad, A. C. Recuperado de http://www.icesi.org.mx/ publicaciones/articulos/2002/violencia_ social_y_vulnerabilidad_juvenil.asp.
Jost, J. T., & Major, B. (2001). The Psychology of Legitimacy: Emerging Perspectives on Ideology, Justice and Intergroup Relations. (2a ed.). Londres: Cambridge University Press.
Lind, E. A. (1997). Litigation and claiming in organizations: Antisocial behavior or quest for justice? En R. A. Giacalone & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Antisocial behavior in organizations (pp. 150-171). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Little, T., Cunningham, W., Shahar, G., &
Widaman, K. (2002). To parcel or not parcel: Exploring the question, weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9, 151-173.
Maiese, M. (2004). Procedural Justice. Beyond Intractability. En G. Burgess & H. Burgess (Eds.), Conflict Information Consortium, University of Colorado, Boulder. Recuperado de: <http://www.beyondintractability.org/bi- essay/procedural-justice>.
Perelman, C. (1964). De la Justicia. México DF: Universidad Autónoma de México, Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas.
Pound, R. (1951). The need of a sociological jurisprudence. Justice According to Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Manual del usuario del sistema básico de IBM SPSS Statistics 20. (2011). Copyright IBM Corporation 1989, 2011. Recuperado de ftp://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/analytics/ spss/documentation/statistics/20.0/es/client/ Manuals/IBM_SPSS_Statistics_Core_ System_Users_Guide.pdf.
Stammler, R. (1958). La esencia del derecho y la ciencia del derecho. Madrid: Espasa–Calpe.
Tyler, T. R. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. En M. H. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 30, pp. 431-505). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tyler, T. R. (2006). Perception of adolescents about the judicial procedure and treatment in detention and their effect on social rehabilitation. Princenton: Princeton University Press.
Tyler, T. R., & Bies, R. J. (1990). Beyond formal procedures: The interpersonal context of procedural justice. In J. Carroll (Ed.), Applied social psychology and organizational settings, (pp.77-98). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
Tyler, T. R., & Blader, S. L. (2000). Cooperation in groups: Procedural justice, social identity and behavioral engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
Tyler, T. R., & Huo, Y. J. (2002). Trust in the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Tyler, T. R., & Mentovich, A. (2011). Mechanisms of Legal Effect: Theories of Procedural Justice. A methods monograph. New York: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.
Ullman, J. B. (2006). Structural equation modeling: Reviewing the basics and moving forward. Journal of Personality Assessment, 87, 35–50.
Weisz, V., Wingrove, T., & Faith-Slaker, A. (2007). Children and Procedural Justice. Court Review. The Journal of the American Judges Association, 44, 216. Recuperado de http:// digitalcommons.unl.edu/ajacourtreview/216.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2014
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.