Palabras clave
modelo de agentes
redes sociales
identidad colectiva
emociones
Cómo citar
Resumen
El propósito del presente estudio fue explorar la relación entre variables cognitivas, emocionales, contextuales y la topología de las redes no digitales en el surgimiento, mantenimiento y extinción de la acción colectiva mediante un modelo basado en agentes. Con ayuda de NetLogo, se desarrollaron diferentes topologías de red, se modeló la identidad social, eficacia colectiva, norma social, enojo, hermetismo del sistema político. Se realizaron 22,000 mil simulaciones variando el número promedio de nodos que conectan a los agentes. Se encontró que el número promedio de días donde se mantenía activa la acción colectiva se relacionó en forma de sigmoide con el número promedio de conexiones entre los agentes. El enojo como variable psicológica motivó fuertemente a los agentes a participar en la acción colectiva. Los modelos basados en agentes ayudan a comprender fenómenos como la emergencia, la transición de fase o la autoorganización en fenómenos sociales complejos como la acción colectiva.
Citas
Aguilera, O. A., y Posada, C. M. (2017). Introducción al modelado basado en agentes: Una aproximación desde Netlogo. El Colegio de San Luis. https://colsan.repositorioinstitucional.mx/jspui/handle/1013/792
Alzate, Z. M. L. (2008). Esbozo teórico de la acción política colectiva. Experiencias colectivas alternativas frente a las relaciones hegemónicas de dominación. Investigación y Desarrollo, 16(2), 278-303. https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=26816203
Amaral, I. (2017). Computational Social Sciences. Springer.
Asgharpourmasouleh, A., Fattahzadeh, M., Mayerhoffer, D., & Lorenz, J., (2020). On the Fate of Protests: Dynamics of Social Activation and Topic Selection Online and in the Streets. In E. Deutschmann., J. Lorenz., L. G. Nardin., D. Natalini., and A. F. X. Wilhelm (Eds.), Computational Conflict Research (pp. 141-164). Springer.
Bamberg, S., Rees, J., & Seebauer, S. (2015). Collective Climate Action: Determinants of Participation Intention in Community-Based Pro-Environmental Initiatives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 155-165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.006
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W.H. Freeman and Company.
Biecek, P., & Burzykowski, T. (2021). Explanatory Model Analysis: Explore, Explain, and Examine Predictive Models. CRC Press.
Bourhis, R. Y., Moise, L. C., Perreault, S., & Senecal, S. (1997). Towards an Interactive Acculturation Model: A Social Psychological Approach. International Journal of Psychology, 32(6), 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075997400629
Buffa, B. (2015). Métodos matemáticos para modelos basados en agentes [trabajo final]. Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. https://rdu.unc.edu.ar/bitstream/handle/11086/2773/TF17163.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Calle, L., & Sánchez-Cuenca, I. (2020). Violence and Mobilization Probing the Inverted U-Shaped Link between Protest and Terrorism. Taiwan Journal Democracy 16(1),143-170. https://www.airitilibrary.com/Article/Detail/18157238-202007-202008260007-202008260007-51-79
Cialdini, R. B. (2007). Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. Harper Collins Publishers.
Couzin, I. D., Krause, J., Franks, N. R., & Levin, S. A. (2005). Effective Leadership and Decision-Making in Animal Groups on the Move. Nature, 433(7025), 513-516. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03236
Delgado, S. R. y Arias, H. J. C. (2018). La acción colectiva de los jóvenes y la construcción de ciudadanía. Revista Argentina de Sociología, 6(11), 272-296. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/269/26911765014.pdf
Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2005). Explaining Enduring Empowerment: A Comparative Study of Collective Action and Psychological Outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 35-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.231
Flache, A., Mäs, M., Feliciani, T., Chattoe-Brown, E., Deffuant, G., Huet, S., & Lorenz, J. (2017). Models of Social Influence: Towards the Next Frontiers. Journal of Artificial Societies & Social Simulation, 20(4), 2. https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.3521
Francisco, R. A. (2005). The Dictator’s Dilemma. In C. Davenport, H. Johnston, & C. Mueller (Eds.), Repression and Mobilization (pp. 58-82). University of Minnesota Press.
Groenendyk, E. W., & Banks, J. A. (2014). Emotional Rescue: How Affect Helps Partisans Overcome Collective Action Problems. Political Psychology, 35(3), 359-378. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2009.00750.x
Hogg, M. A., & Reid, S. A. (2006). Social Identity Self-Categorization, and the Communication of Group Norms. Communication Theory, 16(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2006.00003.x
Horcajo, J., Petty R. E, & Briñol, P. (2010). The Effects of Majority Versus Minority Source Status on Persuasion: A Self Validation Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 498–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018626
Jasper, J. M. (2018). The Emotions of Protest. University of Chicago Press.
Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and Participation: Social-Psychological Expansions of Resource Mobilization Theory. American Sociological Review, 49(5), 583-600. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095417
Kohne, J., Gallagher, N., Kirgil, Z. M., Paolillo, R. Padmos, L., & Karimi. F. (2020). The Role of Network Structure and Initial Group Norm Distributions in Norm Conflict. In E. Deutschmann, J. Lorenz, L. G. Nardin, D. Natalini, & A. F. X. Wilhelm (Eds.), Computational Conflict Research (pp. 113-140). Springer.
Kundu, P., & Cummins, D. D. (2013). Morality and Conformity: The Asch Paradigm Applied to Moral Decisions. Social Influence, 8(4), 268–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510.2012.727767
Latané, B. (1981). The Psychology of Social Impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343–356. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.36.4.343
Lodge, M., & Taber, C. S. (2005). The Automaticity of Affect for Political Leaders, Groups, and Issues: An Experimental Test of the Hot Cognition Hypothesis. Political Psychology, 26(3), 455-482. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00426.x
Lorenz, J. (2007). Continuous Opinion Dynamics Under Bounded Confidence: A Survey. International Journal of Modern Physics C, 18(12), 1819–1838. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129183107011789
Macy, M. W., & Willer, R. (2002). From Factors to Actors: Computational Sociology and Agent based modeling. Annual Review of Sociology, 28(1), 143-166. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.28.110601.141117
Major, B. (1994). From Social Inequality to Personal Entitlement: The Role of Social Comparisons, Legitimacy Appraisals, and Group Membership. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 26, pp. 293-355). Academic Press.
Neumann, M. (2008). Homo Socionicus: A Case Study of Simulation Models of Norms. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 11(4), 6. https://www.jasss.org/11/4/6.html
Packer, D. J., & Miners, C. T. (2014). Tough Love: The Normative Conflict Model and A Goal System Approach to Dissent Decisions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(7), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12114
Passy, F., & Giugni, M. (2001). Social Networks and Individual Perceptions: Explaining Differential Participation in Social Movements. Sociological Forum, 16(1), 123-153. https://www.jstor.org/stable/685032
Poma, A., y Gravante, T. (2022). Cómo estudiar la dimensión emocional en los movimientos sociales. Campos en Ciencias Sociales, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.15332/25006681.7667
Rees, J. H., & Bamberg, S. (2014). Climate Protection Needs Societal Change: Determinants of Intention to Participate in Collective Climate Action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(5), 466-473. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2032
Rouquette, M. L. (1998). Sur la Construction des Mondes Politiques: Psychologie et Politique. Bulletin de Psychologie, 51(433), 41-43. https://www.persee.fr/doc/bupsy_0007-4403_1998_num_51_433_14699
Sabucedo, J. M., Dono, M., Alzate, M., & Seoane, G. (2018). The Importance of Protesters´ Moral: Moral Obligation as a Key Variable to Understand Collective Action. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00418
Schelling, T. C. (1971). Dynamic Models of Segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(2), 143–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1971.9989794
Schmitt, M. T., & Branscombe, N. R. (2002). The Meaning and Consequences of Perceived Discrimination in Disadvantaged and Privileged Social Groups. European Review of Social Psychology, 12(1), 167-199. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792772143000058
Simon, B., Loewy, M., Stürmer, S., Weber, U., Freytag, P., Habig, C., Kampmeier, C., & Spahlinger, P. (1998). Collective Identification and Social Movement Participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 646-658.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.3.646
Squazzoni, F., Jager W., & Edmonds, B. (2014). Social Simulation in the Social Sciences: A Brief Overview. Social Science Computer Review, 32(3), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439313512975
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A Value-Belief-Norm Theory of Support for Social Movements: The Case of Environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81-97. https://www.humanecologyreview.org/pastissues/her62/62sternetal.pdf
Stürmer, S., & Simon, B. (2009). Pathways to Collective Protest: Calculation, Identification, or Emotion? A Critical Analysis of the Role of Group-Based Anger in Social Movement Participation. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 681-705.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01620.x
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human Groups and Social Categories: Studies in Social Psychology. Cambridge University Press.
Thomas, E. F., Mavor, K. I., & McGarty, C. (2012). Social Identities Facilitate and Encapsulate Action Relevant Constructs: A Test of the Social Identity Model of Collective Action. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(1), 75-88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211413619
Turner, R. H., & Killian, L. M. (1987). Collective Behavior (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
Van Stekelenburg, J., Klandermans, B., & Van Dijk, W. (2009). Context Matters: Explaining How and Why Mobilizing Context Influences Motivational Dynamics. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 815-838. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01626.x
Van Troost, D., Van Stekelenburg, J., & Klandermans, B. (2013). Emotions of Protest. In N. Demertzis (Ed.), Emotions in Politics. The Affect Dimension in Political Tension (pp. 186-203). Palgrave MacMillan.
Van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an Integrative Social Identity Model of Collective Action: A Quantitative Research Synthesis of Three Socio-Psychological Perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 353-372.
https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504
Veenstra, R. & Steglich, C. (2011). Actor-Based Model for Network and Behavior Dynamics. In B.P- Laursen, T. D. Little, & N. A. Card (eds.), Handbook of Developmental Research Methods. Guilford Press.
Ward, C., Fox, S., Wilson, J., Stuart, J, & Kus, L. (2010). Contextual Influences on Acculturation Processes: The Roles of Family Community and Society Psychological Studies, 55(1), 26–34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12646-010-0003-8
Watts, D. J. (2002). A Simple Model of Global Cascades on Random Networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99(9), 5766–5771. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.082090499
Wilensky, U., & Rand, W. (2015). An Introduction to Agent-Based Modeling: Modeling Natural, Social, and Engineered Complex Systems with NetLogo. Mit Press.
Wlodarczyk, A., Basabe, N., Páez, D., & Zumeta, L. (2017). Hope and Anger as Mediators Between Collective Action Frames and Participation in Collective Mobilization: The Case of 15-M. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v5i1.471
Zamudio, S. A., Montero-López, L. M., y García, C. B. (2022). Acción colectiva en el 8 de marzo, prueba empírica de tres modelos teóricos. Psicología Iberoamericana, 30(1), e301416. https://doi.org/10.48102/pi.v30i1.416
Zhang, H., & Vorobeychik, Y. (2017). Empirically Grounded Agent-Based Models of Innovation Diffusion: A Critical Review. Artificial Intelligence Review, 52(1), 707–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-017-9577-z
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2023