Financial Self-Efficacy, Frugality, and Life Satisfaction. Does income affect the relationship?
PDF (Español)
XML (Español)

Keywords

frugal behavior
self-efficacy
economic income
life satisfaction
social relationships

How to Cite

Suárez Rodríguez, E. J. ., Hernández Ruiz, B., Muiños Trujillo, G. ., & Alonso Valdivia, L. . (2022). Financial Self-Efficacy, Frugality, and Life Satisfaction. Does income affect the relationship?. Psicumex, 12(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.36793/psicumex.v12i1.419

Metrics

Abstract

Frugal behavior is focused on a voluntary reduction in consumption as a result of combining an ingenious use of resources and voluntary restriction of spending on new products and services. However, for frugal behavior to be a plausible alternative, frugality must be associated with positive psychological elements rather than with constant effort. In this study, we analyzed the relationship between frugal behavior, financial self-efficacy and, satisfaction with life, taking into account people's economic resources. We conducted two correlational studies with 186 university students and 154 participants from the general population, respectively. The results obtained in both studies indicate that frugal behavior requires that people perceive themselves as capable of saving and to be competent in the use of resources. We also observed a significant relationship between frugal behavior and satisfaction with life, although in the second study we found that this relationship was moderated by income level. Frugal behavior is associated with higher life satisfaction in people with higher income levels but is associated with lower life satisfaction in those with lower incomes. Therefore, frugal consumption can be a positive consumption alternative associated with well-being, to the extent that the perceived and objective resources are sufficient for people to be able to choose their own consumption style.

https://doi.org/10.36793/psicumex.v12i1.419
PDF (Español)
XML (Español)

References

Albert, M. (2019). Sustainable Frugal Innovation-The Connection Between Frugal Innovation and Sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117747. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117747

Asebedo, S. D., & Seay, M. C. (2018). Financial Self-Efficacy and the Saving Behavior of Older Pre-Retirees. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 29(2), 357-368. http://dx.doi.org/10.1891/1052-3073.29.2.357

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.

Boujbel, L., & d’Astous, A. (2012). Voluntary Simplicity and Life Satisfaction: Exploring the Mediating Role of Consumption Desires. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 11(6), 487–494. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1399

Bresó, E., Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2011). Can a Self-Efficacy-Based Intervention Decrease Burnout, Increase Engagement, and Enhance Performance? A Quasi-Experimental Study. Higher Education, 61(4), 339-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10734-010-9334-6

Bustos-Aguayo, J., Herrera Flores, M., & Andrade Palos, P. (2004). Predicción de la conservación de agua a partir de factores socio-cognitivos. Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano, 5(1-2), 53-70. https://www.zaragoza.unam.mx/wp content/Portal2015/Licenciaturas/psicologia/articulos/prediccion_conservacion.pdf

Cabañero Martínez, M. J., Richart Martínez, M., Cabrero García, J., Orts Cortés, M. I., Reig Ferrer, A., & Tosal Herrero, B. (2004). Fiabilidad y validez de la escala de satisfacción con la vida de Diener en una muestra de mujeres embarazadas y puérperas. Psicothema, 16(3), 448-455. https://www.psicothema.com/pdf/3017.pdf

Carrero, I., Valor, C., & Redondo, R. (2020). Do All Dimensions of Sustainable Consumption Lead to Psychological Well-Being? Empirical Evidence from Young Consumers. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 33(1), 145-170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-019-09818-8

Carton, F. L., Xiong, H., & McCarthy, J. B. (2022). Drivers of Financial Well-Being in Socio-Economic Deprived Populations. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance. 34, 100628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbef.2022.100628

Cavaliere, A., De Marchi, E., & Banterle, A. (2018). Exploring the Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet and its Relationship with Individual Lifestyle: The Role of Healthy Behaviors, Pro-Environmental Behaviors, Income, and Education. Nutrients, 10(2), 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10020141

Corral-Verdugo, V., & Encinas-Norzagaray, L. (2001). Variables disposicionales, situacionales y demográficas en el reciclaje de metal y papel. Medio Ambiente y Comportamiento Humano, 2(2), 1-19. https://www.academia.edu/890457/Variables_disposicionales_situacionales_y_demogr%C3%A1ficas_en_el_reciclaje_de_metal_y_papel

Corral-Verdugo, V., González-Lomelí, D., Rascón-Cruz, M., & Corral-Frías, V. O. (2016). Intrinsic Motives of Autonomy, Self-Efficacy, and Satisfaction Associated with Two Instances of Sustainable Behavior: Frugality and Equity. Psychology, 7(5), 662-671.

http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/psych.2016.75068

Corral-Verdugo, V., Tapia-Fonllem, C., Ortiz-Valdez, A., & Fraijo-Sing, B. (2013). Las virtudes de la humanidad, justicia y moderación y su relación con la conducta sustentable. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 45(3), 361-372. https://doi.org/10.14349/rlp.v45i3.1479

Corral-Verdugo, V., Robles Pacheco, K., Corral Frías, N. S., Hernández Ruiz, B., & Suárez, E. (2020). Variables que afectan la relación entre las conductas sustentables y sus consecuencias psicológicas positivas: rasgos de personalidad y costos conductuales. Psicumex, 10(1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.36793/psicumex.v10i1.336

Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The Satisfaction with Life Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49(1), 71-75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13

Evers, U., Gruner, R. L., Sneddon, J., & Lee, J. A. (2018). Exploring Materialism and Frugality in Determining Product End‐Use Consumption Behaviors. Psychology & Marketing, 35(12), 948-956. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mar.21147

Frumkin, H., & Haines, A. (2019). Global Environmental Change and Noncommunicable Disease Risks. Annual Review of Public Health, 40, 261-282. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-043706

Gamst-Klaussen, T, Steel, P., & Svartdal, F. (2019). Procrastination and Personal Finances: Exploring the Roles of Planning and Financial Self-Efficacy. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 775, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00775

Ganglmair-Wooliscroft, A. & Wooliscroft, B. (2019). Well-Being and Everyday Ethical Consumption. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(1), 141-163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-017-9944-0

Hardin, I. K., Dewi, S., Said, Z., Rahman, W. O. D., Alzarliani, R., Muhammad, R., & Lamo, M. (2019). Effect of Motivation, Cultural Organization, Leadership and Conflict Management on Participation in Coastal Environment Conservation. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 343(1), 012141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/343/1/012141

Hernández, B., Tabernero, C., & Suárez, E. (2009). Psychosocial Motivations and Self-Regulation Processes That Activate Environmentally Responsible Behavior. In J. Valentín, & L. Gámez (Eds.), Environmental Psychology: New Developments, (pp. 109-126). Nova Science Publishers.

Hüttel, A., Ziesemer, F., Peyer, M., & Balderjahn, I. (2018). To Purchase or Not? Why Consumers Make Economically (Non-) Sustainable Consumption Choices. Journal of Cleaner Production, 174, 827-836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.11.019

Instituto Nacional de Estadística. (2021). Indicadores de la Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible. https://www.ine.es/dyngs/ODS/es/index.htm

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2018). Global Warming of 1.5°C. Special report. https://www.ipcc.ch/sr15/

Ivanova, D., Stadler, K., Steen‐Olsen, K., Wood, R., Vita, G., Tukker, A., & Hertwich, E. G. (2016). Environmental Impact Assessment of Household Consumption. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(3), 526-536. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12371

Johnson-Zawadzki, S., Steg, L., & Bouman, T. (2020). Meta-Analytic Evidence for a Robust and Positive Association Between Individuals’ Pro-Environmental Behaviors and Their Subjective Wellbeing. Environmental Research Letters, 15(12), 1-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abc4ae

Kaida, N., & Kaida, K. (2016). Pro-Environmental Behavior Correlates with Present and Future Subjective Well-Being. Environment, development and sustainability, 18(1), 111-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10668-015-9629-y

Lastovicka, J. L., Bettencourt, L. A., Shaw Hughner, R., & Kuntze, R. J. (1999). Lifestyle of the Tight and Frugal: Theory and Measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(1), 85-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/209552

Liu, X., He, Y., Fu, H., Chen, B., Wang, M., & Wang, Z. (2018). How Environmental Protection Motivation Influences on Residents’ Recycled Water Reuse Behaviors: A Case Study in Xi’an City. Water, 10(9), 1282. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w10091282

Martín, A. M., Hernández, B., & Alonso, I. (2017). La motivación pro-ambiental y la motivación para respetar las leyes medioambientales como predictoras de la conducta anti-ecológica ilegal. Psyecology, 8(1), 33-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2016.1267134

Michaelis, T. L., Carr, J. C., Scheaf, D. J., & Pollack, J. M. (2020). The Frugal Entrepreneur: a Self-Regulatory Perspective of Resourceful Entrepreneurial Behavior. Journal of Business Venturing, 35(4), 105969. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2019.105969

Muiños, G., Suárez, E., Hess, S., & Hernández, B. (2015). Frugality and Psychological Wellbeing. The Role of Voluntary Restriction and the Resourceful Use of Resources. Psyecology, 6(2), 169-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/21711976.2015.1026083

Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018). Global Material Resources Outlook to 2060: Economic Drivers and Environmental Consequences. OECD Publishing, Paris. https://www.oecd.org/environment/waste/highlights-global-material-resources-outlook-to-2060.pdf

Otto, S., Neaman, A., Richards, B., & Marió, A. (2016) Explaining the Ambiguous Relations Between Income, Environmental Knowledge, and Environmentally Significant Behavior. Society & Natural Resources, 29(5), 628-632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2015.1037410

Paddock, J. (2017). Household Consumption and Environmental Change: Rethinking the Policy Problem Through Narratives of Food Practice. Journal of Consumer Culture, 17(1), 122-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1469540515586869

Shafiei, A., & Maleksaeidi, H. (2020). Pro-Environmental Behavior of University Students: Application of Protection Motivation Theory. Global Ecology and Conservation, 22(2), e00908. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gecco.2020.e00908

Shoham, A., Gavish, Y., & Akron, S. (2017). Hoarding and Frugality Tendencies and their Impact on Consumer Behaviors. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 29(4), 208-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08961530.2017.1310646

Song, X. P., Hansen, M. C., Stehman, S. V., Potapov, P. V., Tyukavina, A., Vermote, E. F., & Townshend, J. R. (2018). Global Land Change from 1982 to 2016. Nature, 560, 639–643. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0411-9

Suárez, E., Hernández, B., Gil-Giménez, D., & Corral-Verdugo, V. (2020). Determinants of Frugal Behavior: The Influences of Consciousness for Sustainable Consumption, Materialism, and the Consideration of Future Consequences. Frontiers in Psychology, 11,567752, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.567752

Tabernero, C., & Hernández, B. (2011). Self-Efficacy and Intrinsic Motivation Guiding Environmental Behavior. Environment and Behavior, 43(5), 658-675. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0013916510379759

Tagkaloglou, S., & Kasser, T. (2018). Increasing Collaborative, Pro-Environmental Activism: The Roles of Motivational Interviewing, Self-Determined Motivation, and Self-Efficacy. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 58, 86-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.06.004

Tapia-Fonllem, C., Fraijo-Sing, B., Corral-Verdugo, V., Gutiérrez, C., & Tirado, H. (2006). Validación de una escala de orientación hacia la sustentabilidad. En B. Fraijo-Sing, S. Echeverría, & C. Tapia-

Fonllem (Eds.), Desierto y mar. Estudios sociales en Sonora. Instituto Tecnológico de Sonora.

Tukker, A., Cohen, M. J., Hubacek, K., & Mont, O. (2010). The Impacts of Household Consumption and Options for Change. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 14(1), 13-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00208.x

Umit, R., Poortinga, W., Jokinen, P., & Pohjolainen, P. (2019). The Role of Income in Energy Efficiency and Curtailment Behaviours: Findings from 22 European Countries. Energy Research & Social Science, 53, 206-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.02.025

Venhoeven, L. A., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2013). Explaining the Paradox: How Pro-Environmental Behaviour Can Both Thwart and Foster Well-Being. Sustainability, 5(4), 1372-1386. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5041372

de Young, R. (2000). New Ways to Promote Pro Environmental Behavior: Expanding and Evaluating Motives for Environmentally Responsible Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 509-526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00181

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.