Keywords
quantitative content analysis
framing
scientific production
psychology
How to Cite
Abstract
The term framing suggests that decision-making is influenced by the way in which certain information is presented to people. It has a psychological origin and the construct has been adopted by other disciplines. Therefore, framing is a consequence of the different definitions and methodologies that comprise it. This research sought to map framing characteristics, by identifying the state of scientific production from its discipline of origin, psychology. To achieve this objective, a bibliometric and quantitative content analysis of 63 scientific articles was carried out at an international level within the Scopus database, during the period 2015-2019. The results made it possible to detect the main themes and definitions used in the articles, as well as the characteristics of the authors and publications. We observed that definitions developed in other disciplines are impacting the psychological field; therefore, the possibility of carrying out interdisciplinary research is highlighted.
References
Arbeláez Gómez, M. C. y Onrubia Goñi, J. (2016). Análisis bibliométrico y de contenido. Dos metodologías complementarias para el análisis de la revista colombiana Educación y Cultura. Revista de Investigaciones • UCM, 14(23), 14-31. https://doi.org/10.22383/ri.v14i1.5
Bateson, G. (1955). A Theory of Play and Fantasy; a Report on Theoretical Aspects of the Project of Study of the Role of the Paradoxes of Abstraction in Communication. Psychiatric research reports, 2, 39–51. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/13297882/
Borah, P. (2011). Conceptual Issues in Framing Theory: A Systematic Examination of a Decade's Literature. Journal of Communication, 61(2), 246-263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01539.x
Borah, P. (2018). Competitive Frames and Accuracy Motivations. Journal of Media Psychology. 31, 137-148. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000237
Bos, L., Lecheler, S., Mewafi, M. y Vliegenthart, R. (2016). It's the Frame that Matters:
Immigrant Integration and Media Framing Effects in the Netherlands. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 55, 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2016.10.002
Cacciatore, M. A., Scheufele, D. A. e Iyengar, S. (2016). The End of Framing as we Know it… and the Future of Media Effects. Mass Communication and Society, 19(1), 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811
Carpenter, S. M. (2018). Framing Effects. En J. Vonk & T. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Animal Cognition and Behavior (pp. 1-7). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_1571-1
Ciocca, D. R. y Delgado, G. (2017). The Reality of Scientific Research in Latin America; an Insider’s Perspective. Cell Stress and Chaperones, 22(6), 847-852. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12192-017-0815-8
Chong, D. y Druckman, J. N. (2007). Framing Theory. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci., 10, 103-126. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054
De Vreese, C. H. (2017). Framing as a Multilevel Process. En P. Rössler, C. A. Hoffner, & L. Zoonen (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects (1a ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764
Elsevier. (2020). Elsevier at a Glance. https://www.elsevier.com/about/this-is-elsevier
Fan, W. (2017). Education and Decision-making: An Experimental Study on the Framing Effect in China. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00744
Kahneman, D. (2011). Pensar rápido, pensar despacio. Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial.
Keren, G. (2011). On the Definition and Possible Underpinnings of Framing Effects: A Brief Review and a Critical Evaluation. En G. Keren (Ed.), Society for Judgment and Decision Making series. Perspectives on framing (pp. 3-34). Psychology Press.
Krüger, T., Vogel, T. y Wänke, M. (2017). Framing Effect in Consumer Judgement and Decision Making. En C. V. Jansson-Boyd & M. J. Zawisza (Eds.), Routledge International Handbook of Consumer Psychology (pp. 349-369). Routledge.
Kuhn, T. S. (2012). La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. Fondo de Cultura Económica; (Original publicado en 1962).
Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. y Gaeth, G. (1998). All Frames Are Not Created Equal: A Typology and Critical Analysis of Framing Effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149-188. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2804
Li, K. K., Ng, L., Cheng, S. T. y Fung, H. H. (2017). Reverse Message-framing Effects on Accelerometer-assessed Physical Activity among Older Outpatients with Type 2 Diabetes. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 39(3), 222-227. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2016-0249
Marín Albaladejo, J. y Zamora Medina, R. (2014). Aproximación integradora en la investigación sobre la teoría del framing desde su condición multiparadigmática. Disertaciones: Anuario electrónico de estudios en comunicación social, 7(1), 6-40. https://doi.org/10.12804/disertaciones.v7i1.4527
Piñeiro-Naval, V. y Mangana, R. (2018). Teoría del encuadre: Panorámica conceptual y estado del arte en el contexto hispano. Estudios sobre el Mensaje Periodístico, 24(2), 1541-1557. https://doi.org/10.5209/esmp.62233
Piñeiro-Naval, V. y Mangana, R. (2019). La presencia del framing en los artículos publicados en revistas hispanoamericanas de comunicación indexadas en Scopus. Palabra Clave, 22(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.5209/ESMP.62233
Polunin, O. (2015). Cognitive Representation of Situational and Propositional Time Flow as Basis for Temporal Framing Effect in Future Time Mode. Studia Psychologica, 57(1), 5-20. Scopus. https://doi.org/10.21909/sp.2015.01.670
Romera-Iruela, J. M. (1992). Potencialidad de la bibliometría para el estudio de la ciencia, aplicación a la educación especial. Revista de Educación, 297, 459-478. http://hdl.handle.net/11162/81717
Saperas, E. y Carrasco-Campos, Á. (2015). The Operationalization of the Concept of Framing in the Journal of Communication (2009-2013): Objects of Study, Research Techniques and Theoretical Constuction. Communication & Society, 28(4), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.15581/003.28.4.49-66
Sher, S. y McKenzie, C. R. M. (2006). Information Leakage from Logically Equivalent Frames. Cognition, 101(3), 467-494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.11.001
Takemura, K. (2014). Behavioral Decision Theory. Psychological and Mathematical Descriptions of Human Choice Behavior. Springer. https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9784431545798
Tversky, A. y Kahneman, D. (1981). The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice. Science, 211(30), 453-458. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021