PSICUMEX Journal speaks out against bad practices carried out by authors, editors or reviewers, intentionally, knowingly or recklessly such as plagiarism, self-plagiarism, excessive self-citation, exchange citation, fragmentation of the research, redundant publication, fabrication or falsification of information, manipulation of citation, altered images, duplication of the content of an article due to a simultaneous submission to another journal, the null citation between two linked articles, the non-protection of subjects or study participants , undeserved authorship, academic, personal, economic, political or commercial conflicts of interest, imposition of citations, publication biases, inadequate review when the referee was improperly selected by the editor, or due to the incompetence or lack of commitment of the reviewer to evaluate manuscripts. If any of these practices are identified through access to information on the internet, the review process, use of anti-plagiarism software and / or anonymous reporting will result in suspending or modifying the evaluation process or the retraction or modification of a article already published, if applicable, following the recommendations of the Committee on Publication Ethics and the American Psychological Association.